Life[ edit ] Born in Sliven , Bulgaria to Christian parents, Kristeva is the daughter of a church accountant. Kristeva and her sister attended a Francophone school run by Dominican nuns. Kristeva became acquainted with the work of Mikhail Bakhtin at this time in Bulgaria. Kristeva went on to study at the University of Sofia , and while a postgraduate there obtained a research fellowship that enabled her to move to France in December , when she was

Author:Yotilar Vudoktilar
Language:English (Spanish)
Published (Last):17 June 2009
PDF File Size:17.84 Mb
ePub File Size:16.42 Mb
Price:Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]

Life[ edit ] Born in Sliven , Bulgaria to Christian parents, Kristeva is the daughter of a church accountant.

Kristeva and her sister attended a Francophone school run by Dominican nuns. Kristeva became acquainted with the work of Mikhail Bakhtin at this time in Bulgaria. Kristeva went on to study at the University of Sofia , and while a postgraduate there obtained a research fellowship that enabled her to move to France in December , when she was Kristeva taught at Columbia University in the early s, and remains a Visiting Professor.

She trained in psychoanalysis, and earned her degree in In some ways, her work can be seen as trying to adapt a psychoanalytic approach to the poststructuralist criticism. For example, her view of the subject , and its construction, shares similarities with Sigmund Freud and Lacan. However, Kristeva rejects any understanding of the subject in a structuralist sense; instead, she favors a subject always " in process " or "on trial".

She travelled to China in the s and later wrote About Chinese Women It is an emotional field, tied to the instincts , which dwells in the fissures and prosody of language rather than in the denotative meanings of words.

It is closely tied to the "feminine", and represents the undifferentiated state of the pre-Mirror Stage infant. In Desire in Language , Kristeva describes the symbolic as the space in which the development of language allows the child to become a "speaking subject," and to develop a sense of identity separate from the mother.

This process of separation is known as abjection, whereby the child must reject and move away from the mother in order to enter into the world of language, culture, meaning, and the social. This realm of language is called the symbolic and is contrasted with the semiotic in that it is associated with the masculine, the law, and structure.

Kristeva departs from Lacan in the idea that even after entering the symbolic, the subject continues to oscillate between the semiotic and the symbolic. Therefore, rather than arriving at a fixed identity, the subject is permanently "in process".

Because female children continue to identify to some degree with the mother figure, they are especially likely to retain a close connection to the semiotic. This continued identification with the mother may result in what Kristeva refers to in Black Sun as melancholia depression , given that female children simultaneously reject and identify with the mother figure.

It has also been suggested e. After abjecting the mother, subjects retain an unconscious fascination with the semiotic, desiring to reunite with the mother, while at the same time fearing the loss of identity that accompanies it. Slasher films thus provide a way for audience members to safely reenact the process of abjection by vicariously expelling and destroying the mother figure.

In her essay Motherhood According to Giovanni Bellini from Desire in Language , Kristeva refers to the chora as a "non-expressive totality formed by drives and their stases in a motility that is full of movement as it is regulated.

Kristeva is also noted for her work on the concept of intertextuality. Anthropology and psychology[ edit ] Kristeva argues that anthropology and psychology , or the connection between the social and the subject, do not represent each other, but rather follow the same logic: the survival of the group and the subject.

Julia Kristeva in Paris in In her comparison between the two disciplines, Kristeva claims that the way in which an individual excludes the abject mother as a means of forming an identity, is the same way in which societies are constructed.

On a broader scale, cultures exclude the maternal and the feminine, and by this come into being. Kristeva proposed the idea of multiple sexual identities against the joined code[ clarification needed ] of "unified feminine language". Denunciation of identity politics[ edit ] Kristeva argues her writings have been misunderstood by American feminist academics.

Language should also be viewed through the prisms of history and of individual psychic and sexual experiences. This post-structuralist approach enabled specific social groups to trace the source of their oppression to the very language they used.

However, Kristeva believes that it is harmful to posit collective identity above individual identity, and that this political assertion of sexual, ethnic, and religious identities is ultimately totalitarian.

While the books maintain narrative suspense and develop a stylized surface, her readers also encounter ideas intrinsic to her theoretical projects. Her characters reveal themselves mainly through psychological devices, making her type of fiction mostly resemble the later work of Dostoevsky.

Murder in Byzantium deals with themes from orthodox Christianity and politics; she referred to it as "a kind of anti- Da Vinci Code ". They argue that Kristeva fails to show the relevance of the mathematical concepts she discusses to linguistics and the other fields she studies, and that no such relevance exists. She was supposedly recruited in June Under the Communist regime, any Bulgarian who wanted to travel abroad had to apply for an exit visa and get an approval from the Ministry of Interior.

The process was long and difficult because anyone who made it to the west could declare political asylum.

But the reality shown in her files is trivial. After settling in Paris in , she was cornered by Bulgarian spooks who pointed out to her that she still had a vulnerable family in the home country.

The Bulgarian security men seem to have known they were being played. But never mind: they could impress their boss by showing him a real international celeb on their books About Chinese Women. London: Boyars, Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. New York: Columbia University Press, The Kristeva Reader. Toril Moi Oxford: Basil Blackwell, Black Sun: Depression and Melancholia. Strangers to Ourselves. New York: Columbia University Press, Nations without Nationalism.

New Maladies of the Soul. Crisis of the European Subject. New York: Other Press, Reading the Bible. The Postmodern Bible Reader. Oxford: Blackwell, Hannah Arendt: Life is a Narrative. Toronto: University of Toronto Press , Hatred and Forgiveness. The Severed Head: Capital Visions. Marriage as a Fine Art with Philippe Sollers. Assia Djebar et Julia Kristeva.

The Samurai: A Novel. The Old Man and the Wolves. Possessions: A Novel. Murder in Byzantium.


Julia Kristeva

Sep 17, Erdem Tasdelen rated it it was ok The problem that I had with this book is that it takes what appears to be a personal experience and universalizes that experience as one of all foreigners. The language that is employed here almost seems like it would work better as an autobiography or fiction. As charming as it may be to read about how the perception of the foreigner has kept changing in history, it fails to shed light on the current agenda. The result is thus a utopian wish for individuals to situate themselves as foreigners to themselves, the result of which is to embrace other individuals on account of this realization. There remains yet another point of doubt here for one who is skeptic of psychoanalysis. I am not convinced that emancipation for immigrants and exiles will be achieved through acceptance of psychoanalytic discourse.



Mijas Strangers to Ourselves The notion that the foreigner returns to us as a dark reflection of our inner being, and that we can only ourselvex or hate them to the degree that we accept or reject ourselves, is supported by many examples from antiquity to the modern era most especially, and obviously, Camus and Sartre. Where Kristeva is less skilled is when she speaks of our contemporary times or, at least, the times a few decades ago when the too was written: She then pulls this together by suggesting that this otherness is projected from our own psychological sense of insecurity onto other people, and by doing so everybody becomes a foreigner. Duygu Ozmekik rated it it was amazing Jan 05, Philosophically and in mythology and literature. Refresh and try again. No trivia or quizzes yet. Trivia About Strangers to Ours It seems that Kristeva deeply understands the meaning of question and she also correctly asks us about identity. Mar 09, Sophie rated it it was ok.


Strangers to Ourselves


Related Articles